What are the most common causes of carryover and ghost peaks?
January 19, 2026

System type: Liquid Chromatography (LC)
Instrument Part: Baseline, system signal, retention time, retention time shift
Carryover and Ghost Peaks in Chromatography and Spectroscopy: Causes, Diagnostics, and Permanent Fixes (LC, GC, LC-MS, GC-MS)
Executive Overview
Carryover and ghost peaks are among the most disruptive artifacts in chromatography and spectroscopy. They compromise quantitative accuracy, invalidate blanks, and often lead to false positives or failed system suitability. Although they may appear similar on a chromatogram, their mechanisms, diagnostics, and corrective actions are fundamentally different.
Carryover is a memory effect from a previous injection, run, or scan.
Ghost peaks are extraneous signals not attributable to the current sample.
This guide provides a systematic, instrument-agnostic troubleshooting framework for HPLC/UHPLC, GC, LC-MS, GC-MS, and optical spectroscopy, with clear isolation strategies and corrective actions that permanently resolve these issues rather than masking them.
Definitions and Practical Differentiation
Carryover
Residual analyte from a prior injection appears in subsequent blanks or low-level samples.
Key characteristics
Appears immediately after a high-concentration sample
Co-elutes with the analyte
Scales with previous injection concentration
Often disappears after aggressive washing or extended elution
Ghost Peaks
Peaks not originating from the current sample or prior injections.
Key characteristics
Appear in solvent blanks or before any sample is injected
May shift with gradient or temperature program
Often show different UV spectra or MS signatures than the analyte
Persist regardless of injection order
Rule of thumb
If the peak follows the analyte and concentration history → carryover
If the peak appears independently of injections → ghost peak
Rapid, High-Confidence Diagnostic Workflow
Use this short sequence to classify the problem before disassembling hardware:
Run:
blank → high standard → blank → samplePerform autosampler checks:
Needle-in-air blank
Wash-only injection
Full-loop bypass (LC)Subsystem bypass:
LC: bypass the column and run the gradient with fresh mobile phase
GC: solvent-only injections, then replace liner/septum and trim columnOrthogonal confirmation:
Compare UV vs MS responses
Confirm UV spectra or MS transitions against analyte referenceTrend peak magnitude:
Scaling with prior injection = carryover
Random or persistent = ghost peak
Carryover: Root Causes by System
1. Autosampler and Injection Path (LC)
Mechanisms
Adsorption on needle, seat, rotor seal, valve ports, or metallic surfaces
Inadequate needle-seat wash strength, volume, or sequence
Dried residues from high-boiling or sticky analytes
Worn rotor seals increasing surface roughness and adsorption
High-risk analytes
Hydrophobic compounds
Peptides, phosphates, catechols
Highly basic or chelating species
2. Column and Flow Path (LC)
Mechanisms
Strongly retained analytes not fully eluted by the gradient
Adsorption to active sites on stationary phase or guard column
Interaction with stainless-steel frits or end fittings
Common indicators
Carryover persists even with aggressive autosampler washing
Peaks disappear only after extended high-organic flushing
3. Autosampler and Inlet (GC)
Mechanisms
Syringe contamination or plunger wear
Liner contamination or improper deactivation
Inlet backflash redepositing analyte
Cold spots trapping high-boiling compounds
4. Detector and Interfaces
Mechanisms
LC-MS ion source memory (spray needle, cone, transfer capillary)
LC-UV flow cell residue or crystallization
GC-MS source contamination or high-boiler parking
Ghost Peaks: Root Causes by System
1. Mobile Phase, Solvents, and Reagents (LC)
Mechanisms
Impurities in solvents, salts, ion-pair reagents, or modifiers
Plasticizers (phthalates), stabilizers, or surfactants
Microbial growth in aqueous buffers
Contaminated reservoirs, filters, degassers, or caps
2. Gradient and System Memory (LC)
Mechanisms
Adsorption/desorption of additives in mixers and tubing
Late elution of contaminants retained from earlier runs
Gradient mismatch generating “system peaks”
3. Column and Hardware History
Mechanisms
Column bleed or degradation products
Guard column or inline filter releasing trapped material
Previously retained compounds eluting in later runs
4. Laboratory Environment and Sample Handling
Mechanisms
Phthalates from gloves or lab air
Ink, septa debris, vial caps
Leachables from plastics under strong solvents
5. Detector-Specific Background
Mechanisms
LC-MS background ions (PDMS, PEGs, phthalates)
Fluorescence memory from highly fluorescent compounds
UV-Vis / IR residue on cuvettes or ATR crystals
Targeted Corrective Actions (Permanent Fixes)
Autosampler Optimization (LC)
Needle/seat wash design
Use strong wash solvents exceeding analyte elution strength
Include pH modifiers (acid/base) if chemically appropriate
Apply multi-step sequences:strong → weak → strongIncrease wash volume and dwell time
Dedicate a separate strong-wash reservoir and line
Replace worn rotor seals and needle seats
Use bioinert or deactivated flow paths for sticky analytes
Column and Method Controls (LC)
Extend gradients to ensure complete elution
Add a high-organic flush (95–100% B for multiple column volumes)
Replace or regenerate guard columns regularly
Passivate or replace metal components for metal-sensitive analytes
Match sample diluent to initial mobile phase to reduce pre-column retention
Mobile Phase and Labware Hygiene
Replace all solvents and additives with fresh, high-purity grades
Filter and degas thoroughly
Clean or replace reservoirs, caps, inlet filters, and tubing
Prefer glass over plastic where feasible
Prepare aqueous buffers fresh or preserve appropriately
Detector and Source Maintenance
LC-MS / GC-MS
Clean ion source, cones, lenses, and transfer lines
Bake out under clean gas and verify background spectraLC-UV / Fluorescence
Flush flow cell with strong solvents (e.g., IPA/MeOH with modifiers)Spectroscopy
Clean cuvettes and ATR crystals thoroughly; confirm blank stability
GC-Specific Remediation
Increase syringe wash cycles; replace or bake syringes
Replace liner and septum; use low-bleed materials
Prevent backflash with correct liner volume and inlet temperature
Trim column inlet routinely; use guard columns
Perform controlled high-temperature bake-outs
Acceptance Criteria and Quantitative Evaluation
Carryover Calculation
%Carryover = (Area_blank_after_high / Area_high_standard) × 100
Typical Performance Targets
Small-molecule LC-UV / LC-MS: <0.05–0.20%
Regulated LC-MS/MS bioanalysis:
Blank after ULOQ ≤20% of analyte at LLOQ
≤5% of internal standard response
Always apply method- or regulation-specific criteria where required.
Systematic Isolation Strategy
Replace or clean one component at a time, verifying blanks after each step:
Wash solvent
Needle seat / syringe
Rotor seal / liner
Guard column
Analytical column
Mobile phase A/B
Detector or source
True carryover tracks prior concentration and co-elutes; ghost peaks do not.
Preventive Best Practices
Design methods with explicit strong-wash and flush segments
Avoid ion-pair reagents unless unavoidable
Use inert hardware for sticky or chelating analytes
Minimize polymers and surfactants in samples
Maintain a contamination log and trend blank responses
Summary
Carryover arises from adsorption and incomplete elution in autosamplers, columns, or detector interfaces and scales with prior sample history.
Ghost peaks originate from solvents, reagents, hardware contamination, gradient system effects, column bleed, or detector background and can appear without prior injections.
A structured approach using strategic blanks, subsystem bypassing, and targeted cleaning reliably differentiates and resolves both issues.
Relevant Articles
ChemITrust AI & Lab Services
